The NVIDIA Tegra 2-powered Samsung I9103 Galaxy S II is real

NVIDIA just went ahead and confirmed the existence of a Tegra 2 version of the Samsung Galaxy S II. The Korean company announced that their Super AMOLED Plus-packing flagship was going to run on the home-brewed Exynos chipset, but supply shortages has forced them to come up with a Tegra 2 alternative.

Samsung I9103 Galaxy S II entered rumorland back in February. It seems that Samsung will be unable to provide enough Exynos chips for all those Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Galaxy S II units it plans to sell. Fortunately NDIVIA doesn't mind helping Samsung out with this one.

The performance of the two SoCs should be similar, so those that end up buying the Tegra 2 Galaxy S II shouldn't be too disappointed. After all some of the main rivals of the Galaxy S II (the Atrix and the Optimus 2X) are already using the Tegra 2 so the I9103 won't be, by any means, inferior to them.

The availability of the two different Galaxy S II versions is yet to be announced. All we know right now is that the separation will be geographical.

Source

View the original article here

Does Samsung have a Tegra 2 Galaxy S II I9103 in line too ?

Written by Administrator Thursday, 17 February 2011 10:02

At MWC 2011, Samsung curtain lifted the Galaxy Tab 10.1 (Galaxy Tab 2) which will feature CPU based on Tegra 2 (T20) SoC which at present is top most considered for integration in the upcoming and latest released smartphones and tablets, but on the same hand at the press conference held by Samsung, they declared that Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Galaxy S II will equip Samsung's own Exynos SoC. CPU. Who knows what will these to new devices ship but Samsung has given Tegra 2 priority and is working on to unleash Galaxy S II (GT-19103) and so the proof comes right from their benchmark scores containing information that this new upcoming smartphone will feature NVIDIA dual-core Tegra 2 SoC as a replacement for Samsung's own Exynos platform.

However with this news on hand, its still not precise whether the new model name mentioned would break cover or the same Samsung Galaxy S II (GT-19000) will dispatch with two diverse processor platforms, depending on the region. If in any situation the Samsung smartphone will feature Tegra 2 then it won’t be a bad alternative due to the fact that the CPU performance and benchmarks results are notably better in GPU and Flash performance.

The act of diverting to Tegra 2 platform may be a wise decision as its cause for diversion is that Samsung may won’t be capable to fulfill the require for the dual-core Exynos chips that power the Galaxy S II phones and so the Tegra 2 based smartphone will boost its sales meter essentially. Indeed, it was a matter of fact that Samsung Galaxy S were sold at the count of 10 million units in 2010, on the other hand Galaxy S II has very rare chances to become the best seller product for this year if Samsung won’t integrate Tegra 2 inside it.

The official specs page rolls all the information where you may have noticed or not but Galaxy S II will also equip the same Exynos processor but however its dependant on region, which means the CPU integration will depend in which region you are living. Whether it could be Tegra 2 or Exynos depends on your physical region as mentioned in the report. Have a look for yourselves where you can point out that the GT-I9100 is the normal Exynos based Galaxy S II, and so the I9103 is the Tegra 2 version: Official specs page: Here

Samsung gives an impression of being smarter when it comes to marketing because if they had announced two versions of the samrtphone based on two different CPU platforms, then they would have confused the users, so they decided earlier to disclose it.

You may be eager to get your hands on the Tegra 2 operated superphone but indeed it won’t make a whole lot of change in the performance, you can count on a little bit change, that’s all ! Now it all depends whether Samsung is steadfast to their upgrade/change in the platform or they will manage to adjust with their same CPU platform the “Exynos processor”.

View the original article here